Tryon Life Community Farm: Strategic Planning for a new Urban Ecology

Draft Overview for Iterative Public Review. Ver. 1.0, August 2006

Draft Land Plan (click to enlarge)

(This document is superseded by updated documents available at our Strategic Planning page.

Jump to:

0. Introduction

TLC Farm exists because of the commitment and energy of Portland's broad network of organizations, movements, and citizens committed to a transformation of our urban ecology. It is already living proof of the potential we hold when we work together. Now, we have an opportunity to actualize that potential, to use this place and project as a catalyst for the emergence of deeper and more collaborative relations among varied communities with a common goal for sustainable urban density to become more than a slogan: a living ecosystem of change.


In our six-month strategic planning process – of which we near the mid-point – we have repeatedly used the symbol of a forest. Forests are chaotic, decentralized, unplanned – and yet also deeply peaceful, efficient, and resilient; the complex interweaving of mutually interdependant relations makes them beautiful. Unlike monoculture crops, forests require little or no energetic inputs other than the sun's light, and produce no waste products other than air and water. And especially during the mid-successional phase characterizing moments of change, they are among the most bio-productive ecosystems on the planet.


Portland once was a forest, and in more ways than one, it can be so again.


On the one hand, this means developing experience laying the groundwork for urban ecosystems that support habitat for all our relations: native species, food and fiber sources, ourselves. It means learning how to invite the wild back into our neighborhoods, our daily lives, our self-identity. It means inhabiting a living forest of trees and shrubs and roots, of birds and voles and salamanders – at urban densities.


But it also describes a network of social relationships, a way of understanding the economy of our movement as complex and interwoven, yet evolving agilely and coherently. This is the grassroots momentum that saved this land when it seemed impossible. And it is this work that we are continuing with our strategic planning process: non-linear, iterative, and as broadly-based as possible, designed to invite and support cooperation in imagining and accomplishing the impossible.


So far, our first two large monthly meetings have 1) brainstormed and fleshed out a wide variety of programs and functions that are desired by stakeholders in the broader community, and 2) identified specific implications of these functions, in terms of land use. Our smaller working groups have organized and summarized this information, and have created this document and a schematic draft land plan to summarize the largely unsifted amalgamation of these ideas.


Now, our work is to return to the larger question: how can this place best be used to catalyze the growth of our movements? What is missing from our plans so far? What in the plans is unnecessary, a distraction, or a misuse of this opportunity? What potential conflicts may emerge?


The following five categories describe this initial long-term (ca. 15 year) plan for uses of the land; they are described in the future present tense.


1. Education

Education is oriented towards providing direct experience in the skills and attitudes of a new relation between human and natural ecologies. It comes in four main forms: community workshop series, field trips for youth and school groups, a hands-on learning childcare center, and extensive long-term partnerships with local and international organizations such as Lewis & Clark, PSU, PCC, Gaia University, Cascadia Wild!, Urban Trackers NW, Native American Youth and Family Association, etc.


This educational mission is supported with low-impact but adequate physical infrastructure:


2. Forum

This land is a place in which many organizations and communities come together to fulfill their own goals in a context that grows physical and social ecologies. Besides a beautiful and evocative environment that stimulates increased respect for “all our relations”, this affords an opportunity to develop organic, informal, personal relationships between regular users of the land, a key element of social ecological design.


This function is supported by:


3. Demonstration & ecological design

This place is a premier site for providing direct experience with cutting-edge modes of ecological design that re-integrate human habitat into sustainable, complex ecologies. Paying attention to the comprehensive footprint of the system of relationships occupying the land, including cradle-to-cradle assessments, the place provides a vision of a transformed urban and peri-urban environment and the practices that can get us there.









4. Holistic care for body and soul

Transformation of human ecologies must consider the entire person and our capacity for healthy relations, human and otherwise. By creating healing resources by which body and soul can relax into a wiser appreciation of the many relations that make the world, we provide the basis for a social economy in which cooperation and respect create deeper forms of wealth. Our work is informed by emerging wisdom in ecotherapy and alternative healing traditions. Training and reflection on practice will dovetail with provision of healing experiences.


These will include the following:


5. Community

This place provides a profound opportunity to experience urban density as ecologically healing and community-building. Its relevance for city-wide planning is established: overall, the land exceeds the anticipated population density of the 23-unit development planned previously; the 1-2 acre portion of the land primarily used by residents matches or exceeds the 20-35 people per acre in Portland's densest census tracts. At the same time, the use of the land will demonstrate how deeply interwoven human habitat can be with wild ecologies and food production, as well as other social uses such as education, recreation, healing, and small-scale industry.


The facilities for residential use are positively constrained by the 75% cap placed by the ground lease on additional housing footprint or height: